Reputation at risk over student vote, UCL warns

The University College London students' union is pressing ahead with a motion of no confidence in the provost, Malcolm Grant, despite being warned by the university that the move could have a "significant impact on our approach to future investment".

January 19, 2012

UCL Union was scheduled to open the no-confidence motion - critical of Professor Grant's decision to accept a government appointment to lead the reshaped NHS - to a referendum of all students on 19 January. The vote is scheduled to close on 26 January.

Last month, Rex Knight, UCL's vice-provost (operations), wrote in a letter to the union's trustees that the no-confidence motion - already passed by the union's executive and a members' meeting - has been "undertaken without any consideration of the potential huge reputational impact for both UCL and UCLU".

Mr Knight said the vote "is bound to have a significant impact on the relationship (between the union and the university), our approach to future investment and our view of the roles and responsibilities of the union".

Michael Chessum, a UCL undergraduate and former students' union officer, said: "I imagine that Malcolm Grant would be under very real pressure to go if the motion passes."

Mr Chessum said that pressure would come not from the senior management team - which has expressed full confidence in Professor Grant - but "within UCL more broadly and among academics".

He said UCL was concerned that, after a period of being "quite a low-profile campus politically" it was "faced with an explosion of campus radicalism and people who are willing to occupy various spaces on campus".

A UCL spokesman said the "vast majority" of students were very happy with their experience at the college, according to the National Student Survey, and only a "tiny minority are engaged in this debate".

He added: "We note their concerns, but student politics have always enabled small numbers of individuals to pursue their interests, without having any impact on the life of the university."

john.morgan@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns