Report praises expansion of private colleges

CentreForum thinktank argues that rapid growth has been a ‘good thing’ and that private institutions have been subjected to unfair regulation

November 27, 2014

The rapid expansion of private higher education under the coalition government has been a “good thing” and private colleges should be allowed to raise their tuition fees to £9,000, according to a new report.

The report, by liberal thinktank CentreForum, argues that private institutions have been subjected to unfair regulation in comparison with publicly funded universities, and calls for legislation to establish a single regulatory framework across the whole of higher education.

Public-backed funding for students at private providers has grown from £30 million in 2010 to a projected £900 million in 2014-15, in the absence of student number controls and amid concerns about quality at some for-profit colleges.

“There is a growing recognition within government and within the established university sector that the continued growth in alternative provision is a good thing – good for extended student choice and employment outcomes; supportive of the government’s broadening access agenda for HE; and a driver of new and innovative HE provision through the growing range of partnerships and collaborations alternative providers enjoy with the established university sector,” says the report, written by Stephen Lee, Centre-Forum’s chief executive and professor of voluntary sector management at Cass Business School, City University London.

But it continues that, in the absence of a higher education bill, private providers face a “restrictive regulatory environment that is inequitable and anti-competitive”, citing the introduction of student number controls for the first time this year as an example.

The report’s recommendations include the implementation of an “equitable playing field” between all providers via primary legislation to establish “a revised and single comprehensive system of regulation and administration that embraces all HE providers”.

Students at private providers are currently allowed to claim a maximum £6,000 annual fee loan, compared with £9,000 for those at publicly funded universities. “Current disparities in tuition fees and loan caps between the established universities and alternative providers should be removed,” says the report. “Their imposition distorts the market and is prejudicial to the principles and practice of fair competition.”

CentreForum says in the acknowledgements to the report that it is “grateful to GSM London and BIMM”, two for-profit higher education institutions owned by private equity firm Sovereign Capital, “for their kind support in this paper”.

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

Following on from the last paragraph, can we be assured that this report wasn't, effectively, commissioned by GSM/BIMM or the parent company? The report thanks the 10 staff at higher education institutions who partucipated in the research - 8 of whom are at alternative providers (plus people from regulators and other bodies) The author also thanks several people for "their invaluable input and guidance as the research and the drafting of this report has progressed". They are Alison Wheaton [GSM], Adam Carswell [BIMM], Dr William Hunt [GSM] and Emma Petela [Account Director at GK Strategy, a "public affairs company helping organisations to understand and influence policy"].

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham