REF results lead Wolverhampton to plan for job cuts

University and College Union says proposals could mean a third of Wolverhampton's research professors lose their jobs

July 13, 2015

The University of Wolverhampton is planning to make up to 19 professors redundant in areas deemed to have performed below standard in the research excellence framework.

The University and College Union has called the plans, which sparked a lobby of the university’s governors, “an illegitimate attempt to target individuals that is being rushed through without significant scrutiny”.

The move was announced to professors on 19 May and those selected for redundancy would leave at the end of July, according to the union.

The move affects up to 19 professors in computing, engineering, built environment and law, which, according to the UCU, is nearly a third of the university’s total 63 research professors.

Wolverhampton was ranked 82nd out of 128 institutions on research power in the 2014 REF, showing little change from its 84th placing in the 2008 research assessment exercise.

The Wolverhampton UCU branch says on its website that the university’s “Professoriate capacity restructure” paper “states that, following the REF results, up to 19 professors” in the four subject areas “will be made redundant by the end of July 2015, as their units of assessments have been deemed under-performing”.

Geoff Layer, Wolverhampton vice-chancellor, said: “Following substantial investment over recent years, the university’s research was rated in the UK research excellence framework in 2014 at its highest ever level, with all of its submitted subject areas having elements which were world leading.”

He continued: “We are now looking forward to how we can further develop our academic capacity over the next five years and continually improve the quality of our research activities. As part of this we are reshaping our approach by, reducing investment in some areas as well as creating new areas of academic growth and research.”

Professor Layer said that while “a small number of staff” would leave, the university was “not reducing the numbers of academic staff we employ” and it would instead be “refocusing and reducing staff numbers in some areas of activity whilst growing in other areas”.

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Like the rest of society, universities have largely failed to consider the specific needs of menopausal women. Here, one scholar describes how this can lead to marginalisation and bullying – and why the issue is as important as the fight for maternity rights

16 January

In an era of anti-expert populism, it is more important than ever to stand up for scientific truth. But it is also harder, coming with a high risk of personal attack. Anna McKie speaks to those who have paid a high price for their advocacy, and draws out the lessons for those who want to take up the cause

16 January

Sponsored

Featured jobs

Assistant/Associate/Full Professor in Applied Mathematics

King Abdullah University Of Science & Technology

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer in Law

Liverpool John Moores University

Lecturer in Integrated Healthcare

University Of Central Lancashire