Reasoned debate on faith's policy impact

The University of Bristol has launched an online forum, Public Spirit, to foster debate on the many key areas where faith impacts on public policy.

August 11, 2013

Hosted by the university’s Centre for Ethnicity and funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council as part of its knowledge exchange programme, the project is led by Therese O’Toole, senior lecturer in sociology, with research assistant Stephen Jones.

Already under way are discussions, bringing in academics, researchers, policy-makers and representatives of different communities, on two crucial themes.

The first asks whether Muslims are effective participants in governance or victims of policies over which they have little influence. The second explores the implications of the coalition government’s emphasis on Christianity in a multi-faith society and the role of faith in public service delivery.

Fierce arguments about state funding for faith schools, for example, have made questions of religion and public policy both highly visible and hotly contested.

Public Spirit is designed to provide a space for accessible and recent research and serious analysis of the core issues.

Over the next few months, it will be hosting further discussions on who gets to speak for particular religious groups; what “muscular liberalism” means for faith and integration; and how to achieve the right balance between promoting equality and recognising religious difference.

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan