Readers' reactions

January 5, 2001

Last month in The THES. Catherine Belsey called for an overhaul of 'ye olde' exam classifications.

One reason why degree classifications have survived into the 21st century, despite all the arguments made against reducing various intellectual activities to a single signifier, is that classifications provide employers with a ready-made sifting device. Recruiters can at a glance reject applicants who do not possess upper seconds or whatever. But there is no justification for the the myriad methods of calculating these degree classes. The consequence of these variations is that the same mark profile might be awarded a different classification in a different institution or in a different department in the same institution. Is this a fair price to pay for diversity?

Harvey Woolf
Student Assessment and Classification Working Group, University of Wolverhampton

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented


Featured jobs

International Officer

Leeds Arts University

Central Services Technician

Royal Holloway, University Of London