Readers' reactions

October 8, 1999

Last week in The THES..Martin Ball argued that universities that ban smoking betray individuals' right to free expression

Michael Carrington Wilby Northants

So Martin Ball imagines a world where one in three of the population is vilified for a lifestyle and forced to skulk in corners or evicted onto the street. I have news for Mr Ball. More than that figure are vilified for their lifestyle, skulk in corners and are often evicted into the street - the poor. And it is they who suffer so Mr Ball's masters can maximise profit.

David Baker Reader in politics Nottingham Trent University

How are non-smokers to live their lives "freely" when exposed to the foul-smelling and unhealthy environment caused by smokers? My father died last month of lung cancer, as did my wife's father a few years ago. Both would have argued against Ball on the utility of their lifetime of "freedom" to express themselves through smoking.

Ken Spencer Loughborough

I have founded FLEA - Freedom and Liberty to Enjoy Asbestos. I like to inhale blue asbestos dust and breathe it out over colleagues and students. This is my personal liberty and free expression.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented