Rate your lecturer, urges new UK website

In the US, the Rate My Professors website has been used by students to dish out a “public scolding” to their lecturers – and now the UK has its own equivalent, possibly bringing a shiver of dread to academics and universities.

June 1, 2013

Rate Your Lecturer has launched in the UK, proclaiming that its data – showing feedback and ratings out of 10 on named lecturers by university – will ultimately “generate an alternative ranking system to that of the norm”.

The website, which bills itself as being “by students for students”, states: “Universities and courses will be ranked purely on the lecturers’ ability to educate and inspire, rather than churn out research and publish articles.”

The initial results do not always suggest a sophisticated level of engagement.

A review for a professor of environmental engineering who has earned 10 out 10 from three reviews gives his pros as “Massive sense of humour, dwarfed by intellectual capability.” His cons are: “Profane when discussing LFC and MUFC [Liverpool Football Club and Manchester United Football Club].” Another gives the same academic’s pros as: “He’s the man!” While his cons in that review are: “There’s nothing wrong with perfection.”

Another lecturer, in early modern literature, gets a glowing review, saying that “his genuine desire to help you and make sure you get the best out of your time at Uni are clear from the get go - this is a man who really wants you to succeed”. The con is: “While not necessarily a bad thing, he is brutally honest with his feedback…He swears quite a lot, which some people might have a problem with.”

In the US, Rate My Professors – which has itself allowed posts about UK academics since 2008 - has had a big impact for some.

In 2012, Patrick Hicks, writer-in-residence at Augustana College in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, was moved to write a 1,700-word response to a bad review on the site, in a posting on news website salon.com.

After describing Rate My Professors as “a public kind of scolding, and this one stung”, he ended up thanking the student “for making me think deeply about myself”.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (2)

An interesting idea and one that is being taken on-board by the United Inscriptic Committee (UIC) at Inscriptic - best universities
This is a bad for universities, students, and lecturers. Google "We are not dancing bears"

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework

people dressed in game of thrones costume

Old Germanic languages are back in vogue, but what value are they to a modern-day graduate? Alice Durrans writes