Rate your lecturer, urges new UK website

In the US, the Rate My Professors website has been used by students to dish out a “public scolding” to their lecturers – and now the UK has its own equivalent, possibly bringing a shiver of dread to academics and universities.

June 1, 2013

Rate Your Lecturer has launched in the UK, proclaiming that its data – showing feedback and ratings out of 10 on named lecturers by university – will ultimately “generate an alternative ranking system to that of the norm”.

The website, which bills itself as being “by students for students”, states: “Universities and courses will be ranked purely on the lecturers’ ability to educate and inspire, rather than churn out research and publish articles.”

The initial results do not always suggest a sophisticated level of engagement.

A review for a professor of environmental engineering who has earned 10 out 10 from three reviews gives his pros as “Massive sense of humour, dwarfed by intellectual capability.” His cons are: “Profane when discussing LFC and MUFC [Liverpool Football Club and Manchester United Football Club].” Another gives the same academic’s pros as: “He’s the man!” While his cons in that review are: “There’s nothing wrong with perfection.”

Another lecturer, in early modern literature, gets a glowing review, saying that “his genuine desire to help you and make sure you get the best out of your time at Uni are clear from the get go - this is a man who really wants you to succeed”. The con is: “While not necessarily a bad thing, he is brutally honest with his feedback…He swears quite a lot, which some people might have a problem with.”

In the US, Rate My Professors – which has itself allowed posts about UK academics since 2008 - has had a big impact for some.

In 2012, Patrick Hicks, writer-in-residence at Augustana College in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, was moved to write a 1,700-word response to a bad review on the site, in a posting on news website salon.com.

After describing Rate My Professors as “a public kind of scolding, and this one stung”, he ended up thanking the student “for making me think deeply about myself”.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (2)

An interesting idea and one that is being taken on-board by the United Inscriptic Committee (UIC) at Inscriptic - best universities
This is a bad for universities, students, and lecturers. Google "We are not dancing bears"

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham