RAE is a great boon to equal opps

March 10, 2000

Any move that discriminates against age hits women doubly hard, especially if they are trying to return to a career after caring for a family.

The article "Stark warning of staff crisis" (THES, February 25) quotes from the report Recruitment and Retention in Employment in UK Higher Education that higher education institutions should be able to recruit the "brightest and most talented people" and maintains that these are young people. While true, it suggests older workers are less bright than younger ones. The effect is to fuel ageism and sexism already apparent in academia.

The figures on academic staff by age ratio can be interpreted as showing institutions that do not discriminate against age. Certain institutions are shown as having a higher ratio of staff over 50 per member of staff aged up to 35. Some are willing to take the fees of older students for masters or PhD programmes but when it comes to offering employment or a career structure beyond 50 or 55 they are found lacking. What is the incentive for older people to study?

Name supplied

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October