Quality audit deferred

February 27, 1998

The Quality Assurance Agency has stepped back from the brink of a confrontation with Cambridge University over quality audit.

It has given the university an extra 18 months to prepare to be audited following a series of meetings between QAA chief executive John Randall and Cambridge vice-chancellor Alec Broers.

The move amounts to a compromise between the QAA, which had planned to carry out the audit this year, and Cambridge quality chiefs, who argued that audit was unnecessary in the light of the university's excellent quality assessment record.

Mr Randall said the QAA was offering to adjust its audit time-table for Cambridge and three other institutions in recognition of their heavy assessment schedule over the next few months.

He denied that it heralded an agreement to treat Cambridge with a "lighter touch" under the QAA's proposals for a new quality system, which it will unveil next month.

"There is an understanding that review of institutional quality processes is part of what needs to be done overall," Mr Randall said. "But there are three or four institutions where, in our judgement, we would be expecting too much if we asked them to receive simultaneously a heavy load of assessment and audit."

Mr Randall declined to name the other institutions, but said they all had a large commitment to medicine, which is being assessed over the next few months.

"It is nothing to do with backing off from audit or anything in particular about the subject of medicine. It is just that we are doing what we were asked to do and lightening the burden where assessment and audit coincide," he added.

A consultation paper on the QAA's proposed new quality system, expected in two weeks, will give higher education leaders the opportunity to revisit the question of what is the appropriate balance between quality reviews at subject and institutional level, he said.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns