QAA 'must guard integrity' if university rules relaxed

December 5, 2003

Quality watchdogs must guard the intellectual integrity of colleges seeking to become universities under new government proposals, a think-tank has warned.

Bahram Bekhradnia, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute, wants the university title to refer to institutions with academic and intellectual autonomy that provide a forum for open critical debate. He wants the Quality Assurance Agency to protect intellectual rigour.

The government plans to relax rules on which institutions can award degrees, opening up the possibility of universities run by big-name companies.

Details are still being fleshed out, and the Standing Conference of Principals this week met higher education minister Alan Johnson to discuss them. But it is understood that in future it would be relatively straightforward for any institution with degree-awarding powers to become a university.

Mr Bekhradnia said: "The proposals allow universities to be created that would not be recognised as universities at present. That, in itself, is not a good thing or a bad thing - it depends on how the QAA interprets its role."

In a report published this week on the implications of the government's proposals, he argues: "As at present drafted, virtually all but the smallest public non-university colleges will be able to achieve degree-awarding powers and therefore university status and, in a few years, there could be a number of private or corporate universities as well.

"There is nothing in the criteria that require such institutions to have the academic and intellectual autonomy that we expect of our universities - or that they should provide a forum for open critical debate - but it is nevertheless important that... the QAA has such considerations in mind."

But QAA chief executive Peter Williams said the agency did not have the freedom to interpret its role and would act according to government instructions.

He said: "We will test applications against the published criteria in an objective, professional, disinterested and transparent way."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns