£1 of knowledge exchange funding creates £10 of benefits, Hefce says

Funding council extols virtues of Higher Education Innovation Funding as spending review cuts loom

October 26, 2015
Innovation rocket man

Every pound spent on knowledge exchange brings in almost £10 in benefits to the economy and society, a new analysis from the Higher Education Funding Council for England has claimed.

The research has been released amid fears that Higher Education Innovation Funding (Heif) could be cut in November’s spending review.

Each pound from the fund generates £7.30 in economic benefits in the form of knowledge exchange income for universities, according to a regression analysis commissioned by the funding council. It also creates £2.40 in non-economic benefits, the Hefce analysis argued.

The scheme, worth £160m a year, helps to fund interactions between universities and business, public services, charities and communities. 

It is spent on activities including joint research and development projects, consultancy and training, and setting up new companies.

But uncertainty hangs over Heif as the spending review approaches, with persistent reports that the business secretary, Sajid Javid, is in favour of deep cuts to his departmental budget.

In a statement, the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s chief executive Madeleine Atkins said that the analysis, Assessing the economic impacts of the Higher Education Innovation Fund: a mixed method quantitative assessment, made a “compelling case for Heif funding”.

“The economy and society have benefitted enormously from university knowledge exchange and this is reflected in these research studies,” she added.

“Universities themselves see a wide range of benefits – to their students, staff, research directions and, most importantly, external partners. At Hefce, we take very seriously the return that we must deliver from scarce public money, and here again Heif has delivered substantial and additional benefit for public investment”. 

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan