Prepare for impact, universities told

Hefce head says get set for REF by gathering evidence of how research pays off, Zoë Corbyn writes

June 29, 2009

Universities have been urged to start reviewing their research portfolios to assess the social and economic impact of their work in preparation for the forthcoming research excellence framework.

David Sweeney, the head of research, innovation and skills at the Higher Education Funding Council for England, set out further details of how impact will be judged under the research assessment exercise’s replacement.

Speaking at the Westminster Education Forum in London on 25 June, he said: “We want to encourage higher education institutions to review the portfolio of their work and ensure that they are going to be able to put forward a strong story about impact.

“We are interested in impact – a demonstrable, identifiable difference – that occurs during the assessment period.”

Hefce has already indicated that it will look at research impact on a departmental basis, based on a narrative backed by indicators and exemplars.

The first REF will assess impact made between 2008 and 2012, although the research itself may have been carried out earlier.

Mr Sweeney said various “principles” for impact assessment had been agreed with research councils – including consideration of “high-level skills”, “inward investment” and “new businesses”.

He said impact would “without exception” need to be underpinned by excellent “referenced” research. Before a piece of work would be considered, it would have to meet a “quality threshold” for excellence, he added.

The credit for the impact of a particular piece of research would not follow the academic, but would stay in the department where the work had been produced, Mr Sweeney said.

He also spoke about the difficulty of using metrics, which Hefce had originally planned to use in the REF to a greater degree than is now being planned, in assessment.

“We have established that we are not going to measure things… until there is more hard work done on metrics,” he said.

“We have seen some valiant efforts to quantify the impact [of research], all of which have so far failed and will continue to fail for some time, but we are on a learning process.”

Hefce is due to launch a consultation on its final plans later this year.

zoe.corbyn@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns