Poor students are four times less likely to go to university than their better-off counterparts

October 10, 2003

Poor students are four times less likely to go to university than their better-off counterparts who are more relaxed about incurring debts, according to new research that raises big questions about the government's top-up fees policy, writes Anna Fazackerley.

The research, conducted by Claire Callender, professor of social policy at London's South Bank University, found that prospective students from poor backgrounds had more negative attitudes towards debt than better-off students and were more likely to be put off university because of a fear of going into the red.

Professor Callender said: "If variable fees are introduced and students from low-income families want to go to universities charging Pounds 3,000, some may be deterred by their fear of debt."

The findings follow Professor Callender's research on student support for Universities UK and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. That work was criticised for overlooking factors such as educational attainment.

When she fed prior educational attainment into an analytical model, the specific deterrent effect of debt was even clearer.

She said: "Anti-debt attitudes cannot be argued away by saying they are just part of a broader negative cultural orientation towards going into higher education."

Professor Callender said the typical student who would bypass higher education was a white male from a lower social class whose mother had not been to university, who feared debt and who did not see university as worth while.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns