Plymouth University silent on ‘sexual harassment’ case findings

The conclusions of an inquiry into allegations against William Taylor, the former chair of governors, will not be shared

November 20, 2014

Plymouth University is to keep secret the findings of an inquiry into sexual harassment allegations against its former chair of governors.

Allegations that William Taylor, a retired judge, sexually harassed female students and staff emerged in the media following the suspension of Wendy Purcell, the university’s vice-chancellor. Mr Taylor, who denies the allegations, resigned in September after initiating an independent inquiry into the claims.

Professor Purcell has returned to work as vice-chancellor after her dispute with Mr Taylor – although she will not be chief executive or chief accountable officer and will no longer be running the institution.

The inquiry into the sexual harassment allegations was led by barrister Simon Cheetham and is understood to have now reported.

Times Higher Education asked the university what the findings of the inquiry were. A spokesman said: “All parties have agreed that the report is confidential information, so we are unable to offer comment.”

Asked if the university would relate the findings of the inquiry to the women who made the allegations, the spokesman said: “As previously referred to, all matters pertaining to the Cheetham inquiry are confidential.”

A University and College Union spokesman said that the union – whose members passed a vote of no confidence in Professor Purcell shortly before her return – “has made it quite clear that the current spate of expenses revelations and leaking of stories by warring factions at the top are doing nothing for the university’s reputation. We need full transparency at Plymouth if staff, students and prospective students are to have any confidence going forward.”

Plymouth has also said that it will not answer a series of questions from THE about the deal for Professor Purcell’s return, including whether she has returned on her former £330,000 pay and pensions package, what legal fees have been incurred by the university, and whether she will be leaving the institution at a later date.

The university’s spokesman said that there would be no comment beyond the statement issued on 10 November announcing her return.

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show