Pension plans would cost staff ‘tens of thousands’, says union

University staff would see “tens of thousands of pounds a year wiped off their pensions” if Universities UK plans for change are introduced.

September 29, 2014

The warning from the University and College Union about changes to the Universities Superannuation Scheme, affecting academics and some other staff at pre-1992 institutions, comes after modelling by First Actuarial for the union.

Modelling for Times Higher Education had already showed that staff would see up to £20,000 a year wiped off their pensions.

UCU is balloting members in 67 universities for industrial action to oppose the changes to the USS. The ballot opens on 1 October and closes on 20 October.

The union will be asking members to back plans for a marking boycott and to refuse to set exams.

The UCU’s modelling looked at potential losses for different types of staff. The biggest loser was a professor, aged 40, who joined the scheme at 25 and retires at 66 on a salary of £75,000.

Their current pension of £46,050 a year would see £12,446 a year wiped off under the changes, according to the UCU’s modelling. That amounts to a per cent cut and a lifetime loss of £230,251, assuming life expectancy of 84.5 years.

The next biggest loser in cash terms was a senior lecturer, aged 40, who joined the scheme at 25 and retires at 68 on a salary of £54,841. They would see their £39,657 a year pension cut by £7,341 a year, or 18.5 per cent, equating to a lifetime loss of £121,1, according to the UCU’s modelling.

As THE has reported, UUK explains in a consultation document now circulating in universities that it would seek to replace the current final salary and career revalued benefits (career average) schemes with a more affordable “hybrid” that is “targeted on scheme members with the lowest incomes”.

In this scheme, some 150,000 higher education staff who currently pay into USS would instead contribute towards the new scheme to help the USS close its estimated £7 billion funding gap.

But the UCU says that “the methodology used to determine the deficit is too simplistic and doesn’t take account of the scheme’s underlying strengths”.

UUK has said that it is in discussions with UCU, with whom it forms the USS Joint Negotiating Committee, which will publish its plans for wider consultation early next year.

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham