Pension plans would cost staff ‘tens of thousands’, says union

University staff would see “tens of thousands of pounds a year wiped off their pensions” if Universities UK plans for change are introduced.

September 29, 2014

The warning from the University and College Union about changes to the Universities Superannuation Scheme, affecting academics and some other staff at pre-1992 institutions, comes after modelling by First Actuarial for the union.

Modelling for Times Higher Education had already showed that staff would see up to £20,000 a year wiped off their pensions.

UCU is balloting members in 67 universities for industrial action to oppose the changes to the USS. The ballot opens on 1 October and closes on 20 October.

The union will be asking members to back plans for a marking boycott and to refuse to set exams.

The UCU’s modelling looked at potential losses for different types of staff. The biggest loser was a professor, aged 40, who joined the scheme at 25 and retires at 66 on a salary of £75,000.

Their current pension of £46,050 a year would see £12,446 a year wiped off under the changes, according to the UCU’s modelling. That amounts to a per cent cut and a lifetime loss of £230,251, assuming life expectancy of 84.5 years.

The next biggest loser in cash terms was a senior lecturer, aged 40, who joined the scheme at 25 and retires at 68 on a salary of £54,841. They would see their £39,657 a year pension cut by £7,341 a year, or 18.5 per cent, equating to a lifetime loss of £121,1, according to the UCU’s modelling.

As THE has reported, UUK explains in a consultation document now circulating in universities that it would seek to replace the current final salary and career revalued benefits (career average) schemes with a more affordable “hybrid” that is “targeted on scheme members with the lowest incomes”.

In this scheme, some 150,000 higher education staff who currently pay into USS would instead contribute towards the new scheme to help the USS close its estimated £7 billion funding gap.

But the UCU says that “the methodology used to determine the deficit is too simplistic and doesn’t take account of the scheme’s underlying strengths”.

UUK has said that it is in discussions with UCU, with whom it forms the USS Joint Negotiating Committee, which will publish its plans for wider consultation early next year.

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy