Patentability of computerised inventions

June 19, 2003

Brussels, 18 Jun 2003

The Legal Affairs Committee gave strong backing on Tuesday to proposed EU-wide rules for the patentability of computer-implemented inventions. The committee's first-reading report, drafted by Arlene McCARTHY (PES, UK), was adopted by 20 votes to 8 with 1 abstention.

The term "computer-implemented inventions" does not cover computer software programs as such, but only devices like mobile phones, intelligent household appliances, engine control devices, machine tools and computer program related inventions. While approving the general idea of patentability for computerised inventions, the committee adopted a range of amendments seeking to clarify and tighten up the wording of the Commission's proposed directive and at the same time strike a balance between MEPs' sharply differing views.

The committee says that, in order to be patentable, a computerised invention should be one that could have an industrial application. It must also involve a technologically inventive step. MEPs also argue that a computerised invention should not be regarded as making a technical contribution just because it involves the use of computer technology. In other words, patents must not be allowed for every simple computer program.

The Commission is asked to produce a report at a future date on how the new directive has been taken into account by the European Patent Office and also to assess whether the European Patent Convention might have to be revised.

Other amendments seek to protect the interests of SMEs, saying the Commission must monitor the impact on these firms of the patentability of computerised inventions.

17.06.2003 Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market       In the chair: Giuseppe GARGANI (EPP-ED, I)       Procedure: Co-decision, first reading       Plenary vote: July, Strasbourg

Press enquiries:Nikolaos Tziorkas - tel. (32-2) 28 42341e-mail:

European Parliament News Report 0618

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns