Patentability of computer-implemented inventions (Extract from Background, Competitiveness Council)

November 11, 2002

Copenhagen, 08 Nov 2002

The Council will attempt to define a common approach, pending the European Parliament's opinion in first reading, on the draft directive aimed at harmonising member states' patent law as regards computer-implemented inventions. The Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) will prepare on 8 November the Council's deliberation on this item.

The proposal is aimed at ending the legal uncertainty and obstacles to trade in the internal market resulting from differing practices whereby inventions can be patented by the European Patent Office or by national patent offices but the detailed provisions vary from one member state to another.

The Council will be called on to resolve the following outstanding issues:

- Conditions regarding claims relating to a computer program on a carrier. The Commission maintains a reservation on the inclusion of a provision not contained in its proposal and on an alternative wording already put forward at Coreper.

- Limitations on the right to patent computer-implemented inventions. One delegation proposes a less restrictive limitation within a provision specifying that a computer-implemented invention may not be patented merely because it involves the use of a computer or other apparatus. The overwhelming majority of delegations and the Commission are opposed to such a wording.

- Expression of a computer program in source code or object code. The Commission has suggested new interpretative wording so as to clarify that the expression of a computer program in source code or object code cannot constitute a patentable invention as such.

The proposal is based on article 95 of the Treaty (qualified majority voting procedure in the Council; co-decision with the Parliament). The Parliament has not yet given its opinion in first reading.

Danish Presidency Website

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns