Oxford cuts to balance books

July 28, 2000

Oxford University has had to make cuts of Pounds 9 million this year to offset costs caused in part by the research assessment exercise.

In preparation for next year's exercise, the university had made an above-average number of appointments over the past two years and had drawn on reserves rather than departmental budgets to cover costs.

But now all departments face cuts of more than 4 per cent to balance the university books. Some fear the cash shortage could promote the case for top-up fees.

In a statement on this year's university budget, published in the Oxford University magazine, the Gazette, the university warns: "The underlying position will deteriorate steadily unless radical steps are taken to align the university's costs with its income in the long term".

University administrators blame a 2 per cent cut in real terms for Oxford announced in the grant settlement in March. This was the result of several measures, including general efficiency gains in higher education and reduced research income because Oxford's RAE showing had not improved as fast as other comparable universities.

To help make the necessary savings, target surplus and contingency cash has been cut by half, more use is being made of trust funds, building and safety programmes have been reduced, and the university has put on hold a planned salary merit award scheme.

Terry Hoad, honorary secretary of Oxford University's branch of the Association of University Teachers, said that any reduction in funding was bad news. "It will unfortunately give some ammunition to the people who think top-up fees are a good thing," he said.

He predicted that cuts would mean fewer posts being filled and less to spend on library services. He was also concerned that more staff would be employed on fixed-term contracts.

The problems facing Oxford and other research universities were an example of the way in which the research assessment exercise could distort university planning, he added.

Oxford University registrar David Holmes said: "In itself it has not brought top-up fees closer. But it obviously underlines the serious position that research universities and others now have."

Last month Cambridge University predicted a deficit of Pounds 2.2 million in 2000-01 to be funded out of reserves, and calculated that the annual deficit could increase to more than Pounds 15 million in the next three years unless extra income was generated.

The Times HigherJJULY 28J2000news 3 X-ray vision: the Blair project for health announced yesterday is billed as a last chance to save the NHS mike sewell

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns