Open access would be financially disadvantageous for universities, says UK minister

December 6, 2004

Brussels, 03 Dec 2004

The system of open access to published research favoured by the UK Parliament's Select Committee on Science and Technology would be costly for both universities and the government, the country's Science Minister, Lord Sainsbury, has claimed.

The committee has been campaigning for scientific research results to be made freely available in libraries and universities. Members argue that the current system sees libraries and other institutions with limited resources struggling to pay high subscription fees, while scientific publishers' profit margins remain exceptionally high.

In a question time session on 1 December, Lord Sainsbury argued that the system proposed by the committee would disadvantage universities. Around ten per cent of publication costs are currently met by the private sector through subscription payments. Under a free access system, all costs would have to be met by the government and universities, he said.

'Would the alternative system of open access actually provide a cheaper system for universities and researchers? There is no evidence for this, in fact it is almost certainly the other way round,' the minister is reported as saying.

The Wellcome Trust, a large funding body in the UK, is reported to be considering asking its grant recipients to use some of this money to meet publication costs, thus making their results freely available to libraries.

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities
Item source: http:/// ALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN= EN_RCN_ID:23019

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns