Online now

July 8, 2010

Last week's suggestion that "consensus is breaking out" about the wisdom of measuring the "impact" of work in the research excellence framework sparked debate. James Ladyman writes: "At all the consultation meetings I have been to ... it has been strongly implied that the impact agenda is happening and that the only way to influence it is in a positive fashion. Words such as 'the government is committed to impact' have been used. Hence the academics go along with the idea and think of clever stuff to say about it. The funding council then reports this as support."

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments