NUS calls for monitoring body

January 3, 1997

THE NATIONAL Union of Students has called for a national council for awards to monitor standards in higher education and approve the awarding of qualifications, writes Chris Johnston.

In its submission to the Dearing committee the union says self-regulation is no longer viable, and the monitoring of standards and quality is of such importance that it must be funded properly.

The NUS also claims there is an "overwhelming argument" for the establishment of a General Council for University Teaching, to provide recognition for those working to improve teaching.

One of the main themes of the submission is "seamless" post-16 education. The NUS declares that the academic-vocational divide is redundant and proposes a general certificate of further education to bridge the gap.

It calls for expansion in the post-16 sector and wants the Dearing committee to set targets - 40 per cent of 18-year-olds in higher education in the medium-term and 50 per cent in the long term.

To ensure that the student experience is not downgraded the NUS suggests the creation of a national ombudsman for student complaints. The union, which conducted its own consultation process with student unions, says there has been a marked decline in the quality of the student experience, due mainly to under-funding. It remains adamantly opposed to student tuition fees in any form, calling for legislation to rule them out.

The union says that institutions should be funded fairly with research cash balanced in order to avoid the creation of an "elite" which creams off the majority of the grant money.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns