NSS scores are a 'weak basis' for policymaking

Universities wishing to improve the "student experience" have been warned they are placing too much emphasis on satisfaction scores despite their limited usefulness.

November 3, 2011

Duna Sabri, visiting research Fellow at the Centre for Public Policy Research, King's College London, said her studies of the National Student Survey showed that it was a poor indicator of quality but was still revered by university leaders.

Speaking at a conference in London, Dr Sabri said the nationwide survey of student views, launched in 2005, had gained a disproportionate influence. "I have never come across an instrument that has more function heaped upon it or importance imbued in it than the NSS," she said. "There is an almost religious belief in the power of the NSS to enhance experience."

Those universities that pride themselves on their strong performance in student satisfaction league tables are also misguided, she said, adding: "It is a weak basis to manage institutional identity."

Dr Sabri said a US-style survey on "student engagement" was preferable because it encouraged people to define themselves as active learners, rather than passive "consumers".

"One student told me, 'The NSS gave me an idea of what I should be getting.' It reinforces the idea that students should be getting something, instead of participating."

Pressure to perform well in the survey also had an adverse effect on academic staff, she said, with one lecturer saying: "It feels like the sword of Damocles hanging over us."

Questioning students about how satisfied they were with their studies six months after graduation, as is done in Australia, could produce more insightful results, she suggested.

Also speaking at the conference, organised by the Society for Research into Higher Education, Anthony Lewis, education and advocacy coordinator at University of Brighton's Students' Union, said: "As a snapshot, all you are getting with the NSS is a response from a student on a wet Wednesday two weeks before handing in."

Written comments and an institution's response to them were the most useful part of the NSS, not ticking boxes about satisfaction, he said.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry