Now apply in writing to go on reading list

March 17, 2006

It is a potential conflict of interest every lecturer is sensitive to. You are giving a lecture course on a topic for which your book is a leading text. Do you add the book to your students' reading list?

Academics in Northampton University's School of Education were "outraged"

to find that this decision had been taken out of their hands by managers.

A memo sent last week via e-mail from Peter Wells, deputy head of the school, said that staff would have to provide an explanation for including their books on reading lists to the school's quality and approval committee, with written support from an external examiner.

Justifying the list was particularly important, the memo added, "if there is an expectation that students purchase these items".

The memo has been condemned by academics as an insult to their professional integrity.

One of them, who did not wish to be named, told The Times Higher : "The memo is clumsy, inappropriate, and undermines our judgment. This is a clear slap in the face and a mark of no confidence by the management in its staff and their professionalism."

Ron Mendel, branch secretary for lecturers' union Natfhe at Northampton, said he would lodge an official complaint about the memo.

He said: "There may be an ethical issue around members of staff assigning their own books as required texts that must be purchased. But that is only added as an afterthought. The way it has been handled is over the top."

A spokesman for Northampton said the memo "arose in the normal course of the school reviewing its internal quality assurance systems" and stemmed from the school's intention "to protect staff as far as possible from potential charges of conflict of interest".

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns