Not-so-dismal science: macroeconomists win Nobel Prize

October 10, 2011

Two American researchers will share the Nobel Prize in economics for their research into cause and effect in the macroeconomy.

Thomas Sargent, William R. Berkley professor of economics and business at New York University, and Christopher Sims, Harold H. Helm '20 professor of economics and banking at Princeton University, will share the 10 million krona (£950,000) prize, officially known as the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.

During the 1970s and 1980s the pair independently carried out empirical research into the two-way causal relationship between economic policy and macroeconomic variables such as gross domestic product, inflation, employment and investments. The models they developed incorporate the role of market expectations.

Both men were included on a list of Nobel Prize predictions drawn up by Thomson Reuters citation analyst David Pendlebury. Mr Pendlebury also predicted the winners of the prizes in physics, chemistry and physiology or medicine, which were announced last week.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan