I am sorry that John Sparks (THES, July 10), who is so much on the same side as I am when it comes to teaching in higher education, thinks it necessary to take me to task, but his "trial and error" is not the same as my "refining over time".
Of course lecturers should have a better understanding of how teaching and learning are related than they normally have at present. This relationship, however, is far too complicated to always get it right first time.
"Requiring students to put up with their teachers' failings" is surely a caricature of "improving in the light of evaluated practice". However, I should perhaps have resisted the temptation of the soundbite "doing the right thing wronger before doing it righter".
And was the Plowden report so wrong that rather than improvement through constructive evaluation it is thought necessary to go back to the methods that did not work before Plowden?
The yo-yo is not a good model for educational change.
Lewis Elton Professor of higher education University College, London
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now