No more visits from bumbling bishops, lawyer demands

October 15, 1999

A national panel of experts should replace the ancient visitor as the investigator of student and staff complaints in old universities, legal experts have argued.

Nick Saunders, director of Eversheds education law group, said that the ancient system, where a "visitor" presides over staff and student complaints in universities with a royal charter, should be reformed to "bring it up to date".

The ancient system which, for example, allows the Bishop of Durham to act as visitor for Durham University, has had to face growing calls for its abolition. Lawyers have suggested that the system may contravene the European Convention of Human Rights.

Although ministers are reported to have conceded the visitor system is outdated, there are no plans to abolish it.

Speaking after a seminar on the future of the visitor at Pembroke College, Cambridge, last week, Mr Saunders said a panel of experts could conduct investigations on behalf of the visitor. He said: "I'm talking about reforming visitorial jurisdiction rather than replacing it. The difficulties associated with the visitor - especially perceptions that the system lacks independence - can be removed by reform of the procedures.

"A panel of people with knowledge of higher education could be

appointed as assessors, and

they could do the investigating and report to the visitor."

Mr Saunders said that there should be a code of practice for visitors to improve procedures. "There have been allegations that visitors take too long to arrive at decisions, do not always give reasons and do not make their decisions public. These have been valid criticisms. We would propose a code of practice that the visitor should sign up to."

Some delegates argued for an end to the visitor, extending the system where judicial review is currently available to non-charter universities. But Mr Saunders said that in many ways, visitorial jurisdiction was superior to judicial review.

He said: "Visitors can investigate matters of fact. They can look at all facts again and make decisions a court would never make."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns