‘No admissions bias’ against ethnic minority students, Ucas says

Study concludes that black and ethnic minority applicants are less likely to be offered a place because they choose more competitive courses

September 18, 2015
Students checking exam results
Source: Alamy

University offer-making “does not reflect any systematic bias” against black and ethnic minority students, a Ucas study has concluded.

The admissions service has released the results of analysis that found that black and ethnic minority applicants are significantly less likely to be offered places by England’s leading universities than white students with the same grades because they tend to apply for more competitive courses.

The findings contrast with research by Vikki Boliver, senior lecturer in sociology and social policy at Durham University, that suggested that highly selective institutions may be unlawfully rejecting applications from ethnic minorities in order to recruit cohorts that reflect the demographic make-up of the wider population.

The Ucas study, which was based on applications submitted to highly selective universities between 2010 and 2014, calculated an “expected offer rate” for 18-year-olds based on their predicted grades and the courses which they applied for, and compared this with the actual rate.

Although the actual offer rate for black and ethnic minority students was substantially lower than the rate for white applicants, Ucas said it was “close to what would be expected”, given that they tended to apply for higher tariff institutions with lower offer rates.

The offer rate was lower than expected in nine out of 14 subject areas, but in five cases the disparity was smaller than 1 per cent. The offer rate for black and ethnic minority students was higher than expected in five cases.

Mary Curnock Cook, chief executive of Ucas, said that the analysis was “encouraging in that it does not reflect any systemic bias against ethnic minorities”.

“What is clear is that the white group of applicants are more likely to ‘play it safe’ with their choices, selecting courses where the offer rate is higher,” she said. “In contrast, the choices of some other ethnic groups – with the same set of predicted grades – tend to be more ambitious.”

Dr Boliver said there could be significant differences in success rates between ethnic minorities, and highlighted that Ucas’ study excluded students who applied before the annual 15 October deadline, and therefore to the universities of Oxford and Cambridge, and for medicine or dentistry courses.

“Ucas’ findings are far from conclusive,” she said. “A much more comprehensive and detailed analysis is needed.”

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related universities

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Ucas: no admission bias against BME students

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard