Most A-level grade predictions ‘inaccurate’

The accuracy of predicted A-level grades may be much worse than feared, research suggests.

November 5, 2013

Only 42 per cent of grades predicted by teachers in 2010 were correct when the final results were published, according to a Department for Business, Innovation and Skills research paper published on 5 November.

That compares with a 48 per cent accuracy rate reported in a study released last month, which tracked the results of students taking the OCR exam board’s A levels in summer 2012.

The BIS study, titled Investigating the accuracy of predicted A level grades as part of the 2010 UCAS admission process, is likely to re-ignite questions over the fairness of the UK’s university applications process, where offers are often based on predicted grades.

Plans for post-qualification applications (PQA) were ditched by Ucas in March 2012 after they received a hostile reception from universities.

It may also raise questions about plans to downgrade AS levels to optional exams from 2015 because many admissions tutors claim they are a more reliable guide to achievement than predicted grades made by teachers.

The report reviews about 177,000 predicted A-level grades in the 2010 admissions cycle – about a third of A-levels taken by those applying to higher education.

It found teachers were more likely to over-predict student grades, with 48 per cent of predicted grades ending up higher than the achieved result.

Only 11 per cent of predicted grades were under-predicted, with students exceeding teacher expectations.

That trend was particularly stark when it came to the new A* grade, which was introduced in 2010 and is used by some highly-selective universities, including Oxbridge.

About half of those predicted an A* only achieved an A, while 12 per cent predicted an A received the higher grade, the report says.

The introduction of the A* also worsened the accuracy of teachers’ predicted grades compared with previous years because an A was once the most easy grade to predict correctly.

Accuracy rates for predicting an A fell from 64 per cent in 2009 to 43 per cent in 2010, the report says. For all grades in 2009, the accuracy rate was 52 per cent, which fell to 42 per cent in 2010.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Very interesting article with some shocking facts. I think that the entire university application process is out of date and needs revision. According to The Independent clearing is now a major part of the application process- 145,730 students going through it in 2013 - http://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/alevel-results-record-number-of-students-accepted-on-to-university-courses-as-clearing-rush-begins-8763794.html I found this article really interesting too, which futher highlights the growing issue of wrong predicted grades and clearing - http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/alan-cairns/university-applications_b_4056417.html

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest