Manchester jobs ‘at risk’ after ‘redeployment’ rule change

Around 40 jobs could be at risk at the University of Manchester after it announced plans to drop longstanding opposition to compulsory redundancies

May 3, 2015

In the past, permanent staff who were no longer needed by the institution in their current roles were eligible to be placed on a redeployment register, on which they could remain indefinitely.

But the institution has said that it now plans to limit the amount of time employees can spend on the register to three months, to reduce the estimated £2 million annual cost of the existing policy.

If the proposal is approved, the staff who have been on the register for three months or more would be at risk of redundancy, the university said. About 40 people currently fit into this category.

The university therefore plans to establish a voluntary severance scheme for these employees, “and if necessary a compulsory redundancy scheme”, a spokeswoman said.

Martyn Moss, the regional official for the University and College Union in the North West, said that many more workers could be affected by the changed rules in future. Manchester has 9,745 employees, according to Higher Education Statistics Agency data for 2013-14.

“It is incredibly disappointing that the university has decided to get rid of its policy opposing compulsory redundancies,” Mr Moss said.

“During difficult times in the past and through the merger [between the Victoria University of Manchester and the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology in 2004], the university maintained its strong and principled stance.

“Such a seismic shift in policy is worrying for staff across the university and UCU has concerns about the potential consequence for members.”

The university spokeswoman said the proposals were designed “to deal with financial pressures and create the financial headroom required to invest in its strategic priorities”.

The change would also ensure the treatment of permanent staff is “more consistent” with employees on fixed-term or open-ended contracts linked to finite funding and special projects, according to the spokeswoman.

There will be a consultation, which will include the UCU.

“The proposals are designed to ensure that a rigorous, fair and transparent process is applied to each individual on the redeployment register who is at risk of redundancy and include arrangements to explore opportunities for the avoidance of redundancy, including redeployment and retraining,” the spokeswoman added.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (2)

Compulsory redundancy if you don't align with "strategic priorities" means you can't undertake the research you think is right unless it's flavour of the month. This undermines a fundamental principle that has made UK research so strong in the past.
I live in Manchester, work in York, have worked at Uof Manchester and Lancaster. The U of Manchester is a great university in more than one sense. Not least it is almost a monopoly research university in the NW of England, dwarfing Liverpool and Lancaster. Yorks and the NE has Sheffield, Hull, Leeds, Bradford, York, Durham and Newcastle. The Manchester-Liverpool city region has too few research universities for its own economic good. And as this shows, the local academic labour market is restricted by Manchester's size.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments