Malignancy of the RAE

November 13, 1998

Richard Bowring rightly rates one major article over four half-baked papers ("Premature publication", Letters, THES November 6). Why, though, does he think the RAE favours the latter? As a panel chair presumably he would score the entries 5 and 1. If the RAE panels do their job properly (and some do) they will discourage the tide of worthless publication.

David de Meza Interdisciplinary Institute of Management, London School of Economics, and department of economics, University of Exeter

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments