LSE warns over ‘threatening’ emails sent to administrators

Circular reprimands staff for firing off ‘unacceptable’ messages during coronavirus lockdown

August 5, 2020
Students attending the London School of Economics and Political Science outside the university's New Academic Building, London, UK.
Source: Getty
Students attending the London School of Economics and Political Science outside the university's New Academic Building, London, UK.

Staff at a Russell Group university had to be told to stop sending “borderline threatening” emails to professional services staff during the coronavirus lockdown.

An email sent to all staff at the London School of Economics by chief operating officer Andrew Young, seen by Times Higher Education, says that he had “seen several emails…from colleagues directed at professional services staff – in some cases, members of our community in the early stages of their career – that are unacceptable in tone, seem intended to undermine, and are borderline threatening”.

“Whilst this might not be the intention of the writer, it is important to call out this behaviour and to start a conversation about why it is happening, because of the effect on individuals receiving such messages,” Dr Young writes.

“We are of course all under a great deal of strain working in new scenarios right now. We’re navigating new technologies and engaging in even more email and digital interaction than usual, all whilst juggling work-life balance and personal responsibilities.

“It’s tough, I very much appreciate that. We don’t always get things right, but this never justifies messages like those my colleagues have received recently. Like all of us, they too are trying their best in difficult circumstances.”

The email, sent during the height of lockdown, says that dissatisfied staff should speak to a member of management, and that anyone receiving such messages should seek support.

Dr Young adds that the road to recovering from the impact of coronavirus would be “a marathon, not a sprint” and that “if we can continue to work in the spirit of collaboration with mutual respect, professionalism and compassion, we will get there so much more quickly”.

The email emerged as one former member of the professional services staff at LSE told THE that they had faced bullying and harassment by a senior staff member for many months, eventually leading them to quit.

The staff member said that they had experienced “sustained episodes of shouting” and “public humiliation including ridicule and insults”, and had felt unsupported and further victimised when they reported the incidents to human resources.

Eventually, the staff member felt that they had no other option but to resign.

“The reputation of the Russell Group universities seems to make senior staff feel immune and superior. My bully thought she could do whatever she pleased, and that’s what she did. That’s what she was permitted to do,” the staff member said.

An LSE spokeswoman said: “LSE is committed to equity, diversity and inclusion for all members of our community and we have clear codes of conduct, as outlined in our ethics code, which we expect all staff, students and governors to uphold.”

anna.mckie@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

Bullies are found everywhere, not just in Russell group Universities and sadly, too often they are promoted and supported while the victim has to leave.
And the local trade union reps are often incorporated by management. They don't give a damn about bullying and harrament of their members let alone non- members. They are more keen on being cosy with management to further their own careers within academia.
The situation gets worse if you are a BAME union member. You are more vulnerable to bullying and harassment and the unions tray you with contempt. Race discrimination within British and US labour unions is very well documented in academic literature.
It's quite simple. Close all universities who received their Charter after 1980 and turn them into Polytechnics. Discontinue the role of CEO and appoint only established academics to Vice-Chancellorships and cut out layers of management changing management into a supportive role Bring back departmental Committies run by academic staff and curtail and cap high salaries. Finally scrap the 1988 Education Act and recover the ancient tradition of Philosophy, Theology and the Human Sciences integrating the natural Sciences in a meaningful framework.
Robin Leslie 2 - I don't disagree with your points, but I fail to see how this would help the problem described.

Sponsored