Liverpool University faculty rejects revised contract terms

UCU criticises ‘gun to head’ of 2,800 non-academic staff

June 20, 2013

Source: Alamy

Standing together: UCU: threat to dismiss and rehire staff could spark strike

One of the University of Liverpool’s largest faculties has voted against plans it says will force non-academic staff to accept new terms and conditions.

At a meeting of about 150 members of the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences’ forum, academics passed a motion condemning Liverpool’s decision to start a 45-day redundancy consultation period for about 2,800 workers.

Liverpool is seeking to “standardise terms and conditions” for its non-academic employees and wants to re-employ them on revised contracts, which unions claim will scrap extra pay for working overtime, weekends, evenings or bank holidays.

Staff have been told that they must accept the revised contracts or face three months’ notice of dismissal. Their jobs would then be offered back to them, but only on the revised terms.

At the meeting on 13 June, which was attended by around 150 people, just 12 voted against a motion criticising the controversial changes, a University and College Union circular says.

The faculty forum agrees that the plans “risk damage to the reputation of the university, to the morale of its staff and to harmonious industrial relations”.

It adds that the forum “regrets the action taken by the university to enforce changes to the terms and conditions of more than half of its staff by threatening to dismiss them”.

It calls on management to halt the mass redundancy process and to restart talks with unions in an effort to reach a compromise.

Martyn Moss, UCU North West regional official, said that the threat to dismiss employees and rehire them on inferior terms could spark strike action.

“[Liverpool] is essentially putting a gun to the head of almost 3,000 of its staff,” he said. “They are not keen on increasing their evening, bank holiday and weekend working, particularly without any guarantees of recompense, and are extremely angry.”

A spokesman for Liverpool, whose full-time undergraduate enrolments dropped by 10 per cent in 2012-13, said it wanted “to standardise terms and conditions to ensure they are applied equitably across the institution”.

It also aimed to “provide greater consistency and transparency about the circumstances in which staff become eligible for certain terms such as pay supplements or compensatory time off”.

He added that Liverpool “will not be making any compulsory redundancies as a result of the new contracts” and is “hopeful of achieving an agreement with each trade union” on the revised terms.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy