Liverpool lifts threat of closure from three departments

Reprieve depends on meeting targets in research performance, writes Rebecca Attwood

May 15, 2009

Three departments threatened with closure at the University of Liverpool have been told they can remain open if they can demonstrate improvements in their research output.

In March, it emerged that the university was considering closing its departments of statistics, philosophy, and politics and communication studies because they showed no “world-leading” 4* research in the 2008 research assessment exercise.

An internal document seen by Times Higher Education at the time said the results raised questions “about whether the level of performance… is at an acceptable level for a Russell Group university”.

The view of the senior management team and deans, the document said, was that “given the need to invest in excellence, it is not feasible to continue to support these areas in future”.

A further five departments – civil engineering, cancer studies, dentistry, American studies and sociology – were also reviewed.

But this week, staff and students who have campaigned to save the disciplines claimed a victory.

In an email to staff, the vice-chancellor, Sir Howard Newby, says that closure will no longer be recommended, provided that the departments show progress.

“As a result of the formal reviews of the eight units of assessment in which the university was in the lowest quartile nationally in the RAE, each affected department has been asked to prepare a recovery plan. These specify clear targets for research output and improving research performance that will be monitored by faculty deans and academic committee,” the message says.

“Provided these plans are accepted by the departments concerned and by academic committee, we will recommend them to senate and the university council. Assuming demonstrable progress is made towards achieving these targets, the option of closure for the School of Politics and Communications studies, the departments of philosophy, and statistics, will not be pursued.”

rebecca.attwood@tsleducation.com

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

Track runner slow off the starting blocks

Lack of independent working blamed for difficulties making the leap from undergraduate to doctoral work

Quality under magnifying glass

Hefce's new standards regime will enable universities to focus on what matters to students, says Susan Lapworth

Door peephole painted as bomb ready to explode

It’s time to use technology to detect potential threats and worry less about outdated ideas of privacy, says Ron Iphofen

A keyboard with a 'donate' key

Richard Budd mulls the logic of giving money to your alma mater

Shaking hands

Lobbying intensifies ahead of Lord Stern's review of crucial assessment into university research performance