I WAS interested to read Les Allen's proposals (THES, February 6) for awarding research grants on the lottery principle. This would have the advantage both of dealing with the known biases of the peer review system and of coping with the ever increasing costs of administering research grants schemes.
When I was a member of the Economic and Social Research Council's research grants board a few years ago, I suggested that (after an initial screening) all grant proposals be randomly allocated either to peer review or to the lottery system (further random allocation to be funded or not). Outcome measures would be easy to devise (project completion, grading of final report, publications, etc).
The procedure I proposed (which met with a stunned silence) would have provided us with valuable information both about the effectiveness of the current peer review system and about the practical workings of the lottery principle.
Ann Oakley. Professor of sociology and social policy, director of the social science research unit, Institute of Education, University of London
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now