Kept down by menial tasks? Black scholars and the ‘neoplantation’

US researcher claims that white academics are given more time to study and write

March 16, 2017
Wire fence

“I can’t come to academia as a black man and not talk about these issues as if they don’t relate to me, because they do,” said Lamar Johnson. “My body is still subjected to racial disparity; my humanity will still be tested in academic spaces.”

According to Dr Johnson, an assistant professor in Michigan State University’s department of English, academia is not the safe, liberal haven many imagine; it is a “contested space” for black researchers. This is the case not only in the US, he said, but around the world, including in Africa.

While young black men such as Michael Brown are shot dead in the streets of Missouri, Dr Johnson argues that black scholars are suffering “spirit murder”: racial oppression in academia. In his recent paper, “Using our voices, losing our bodies: Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, and the spirit murders of black male professors in the academy”, he reflects on how other academics and students use metaphorical “bullets” to reject, silence and disrespect black academics.

“The people who benefit from [higher education] are primarily white folk; they’re shooting bullets at us. You think about scholars of colour: we’re always asked to be on multiple service committees within a department; we’re always asked to do more things than our white colleagues,” Dr Johnson told Times Higher Education. “Those bullets are being shot at us, and they impact on us doing our research and writing.”

It is one thing to appoint some black academics, Dr Johnson said, but another to sustain them. He claims that black academics are kept busy with menial tasks and are therefore prevented from dedicating as much time to their research as their colleagues are.

“That’s why I say [academia] is the neoplantation,” he said. “They have repackaged the way that they are using our black and brown bodies.”

The barriers that prevent black people from thriving in academia begin in the classroom, Dr Johnson said. Exams, curricula and teaching resources fail to reflect black experiences and culture and discourage black students from entering higher education.

Dr Johnson is working on “critical race English education”, a framework that develops counter-narratives to encourage black students, such as by acknowledging the contribution of black figures in history. It also encourages teaching and learning through different media – such as hip hop, poetry, dance and art – to incorporate black culture into education.

Dr Johnson also enjoys challenging traditional means of presenting academic work. In his most recent article, he features an exchange of expressive text messages between himself and a colleague to compare the murder of young black men on the streets with the metaphorical murder of black academics. It is unfitting to write about subjects such as racially motivated murder in an abstract, objective style, he argued.

“We have to think about dismantling the traditional way of doing research. And many research articles are very traditional, they’re very didactic and they’re written in a very particular way and that’s dehumanising in itself. There are so many ways in which we could tell our stories.”

“I want my grandma to pick up my article and understand it and relate to it,” Dr Johnson continued. “When I’m writing it’s very personal; I’m writing and telling my story, and so I’m also writing to heal myself and my racial wounds. I’m writing to resist.”

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Really? If academics of any given ethnicity/gender were NOT being appointed to service committees, no doubt the author would be at the front of the line shouting "racism" or "sexism" (provided his ethnicity or gender was the one being underrepresented). So now that universities are doing the right thing by making diverse appointments to their committees, he's complaining (like every academic who gets tapped to sit on a few committees) that it's eating into research time. Sure it does. It's the same for all of us: black, white or candy-striped, male, female or 'other' of your choice. We all have to juggle teaching, admin, and research to get everything done and get home nights. If you want to whine, pick a sensible reason: perhaps your university is short on administrators and expects too much from academics, maybe there are just too many service committees and they could be organisated more efficiently. Look for solutions, don't merely moan about something you cannot change but find something that you can change. Fix problems, not blame.