Journal citation cartels on the rise

The number of journals denied an impact factor for taking part in citation cartels has risen sharply this year, pushing up the total number of excluded journals.

June 21, 2013

According to the 2013 edition of Thomson Reuters’ Journal Citation Reports, published on Wednesday, 37 journals have been added to the banned list this year for having “anomalous citation patterns”.

This phrase has traditionally meant having an excessive number of self-citations. However, last year Thomson Reuters also began screening for journals that exchange large numbers of citations with other journals in a cartel-like arrangement, which it calls “citation stacking”.

Of the 37 journals added to the banned list this year, 14 were for the latter offence. Last year only three were deemed guilty.

Most journals remain on the banned list for two years, meaning that, in total 66 journals are currently denied an impact factor. This compares to 51 last year, when 26 journals were added to the list.

The current figure is a historic high, although the number of journals indexed by Thomson Reuters also grows every year.

In 2006, seven journals were added to the banned list, representing 0.1 per cent of the indexed total of 6,166. The 37 titles suppressed in 2012 equates to 0.3 per cent of the total of 10,853.

Impact factors represent the average number of citations garnered by articles published by a journal over the previous two years. They are often used as a measure of the quality of the journal, though critics often claim that the averages are often skewed by a few highly cited papers.

Even more controversially, individual researchers are often assessed by funding, hiring and promotion committees according to the impact factors of the journals in which they have published. In May a prominent group of journals, learned societies and funders, including the Wellcome Trust and the Higher Education Funding Council for England, called for this practice to end.

The journal with by far the largest impact factor, 153.459, is the cancer journal CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. Second, with a factor of 51.658, is the New England Journal of Medicine, followed by Reviews of Modern Physics, with 44.982. Nature, with a factor of 38.597, is seventh overall, and the highest ranked of the general science journals.

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

I personally just came to academic research. Its difficult to find all information I have gone through.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together