Italian academics fear for freedom after League attack on book

Author concerned about lack of pushback after Italy's far-right governing party demanded removal of critical book from reading list

May 28, 2019
Source: Alamy
Political screening ‘they are actually criticising researchers…they want to shut down opinions’

Calls by Italy’s far-right governing party for a book about it to be removed from a university reading list have been met with limited resistance, Italian academics have warned, opening the door for further attacks on academic freedom in the future.

Last month, a regional branch of the League, part of Italy’s governing coalition and currently the country’s most popular party, demanded the removal of La Lega di Salvini from the reading list of a course taught by a political science professor at the University of Bologna.

The branch objected to the book’s description of the party as “extreme right” and to its criticisms of Matteo Salvini, the party’s leader and Italy’s deputy prime minister.

Academics have a duty of loyalty to the state, and universities should not be places of political “propaganda”, party representatives argued in the Emilia-Romagna regional assembly.

Gianluca Passarelli, a political scientist at Sapienza University of Rome and co-author of the book, told Times Higher Education that his biggest surprise had been how little reaction there had been in Italy to such an attack.

“From a media point of view, there has been no attention,” he said.

The book, published in September 2018, draws on surveys and policy documents to examine the party, which entered government last June in coalition alongside the anti-establishment Five Star Movement.

In a sense, the book’s content is “quite banal”, Dr Passarelli said, because calling the League “extreme right” was hardly controversial in academic literature and was something that the authors had done before in previous research.

“The fact that they tried to silence our book meant that they…do not accept their identity,” he said. Dr Passarelli added that the incident illustrated that the League was attempting to “deny the freedom of research”.

The League’s attack on the book was “worrying”, said Andrea Mammone, a history lecturer at Royal Holloway, University of London and a commentator on Italy’s far right. It was “one of the first times that someone is challenging an academic book”, he said. “They are actually criticising researchers…they want to shut down opinions.”

Whether the League would continue to attack academic research “depends on the reaction of society and mainstream politics”, Professor Mammone said. “For me, there was not enough reaction.”

Despite the League’s objections, Dr Passarelli’s book has remained on the reading list. There have been no further developments since the initial attack, a University of Bologna spokesman said. Nor has the Italian government enacted any concrete policies to limit academic freedom, said Professor Mammone. The country’s Ministry of Education, Universities and Research is led by an independent, Marco Bussetti.

But Mr Salvini has stoked anti-academic sentiment by repeatedly disparaging the professoroni: know-it-all, elitist experts who, he claims, oppose his policies. “I’m worried about their overall approach,” Professor Mammone said, because the League sees academic freedom as a “leftist bastion”.

“The Italian academy is strong,” said Dr Passarelli. “We are not scared of the League, frankly. The problem is that they do not like universities. They assume that we are lazy, that we do not do anything” and “do not produce anything useful to the country”, he warned.

League representatives did not respond to a request for comment.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

In fact, academics generally do not produce anything useful to any country.
Since when did 'loyalty to the state' include slavish acceptance of any polititician's or party's views without critical analysis?
It seems strange to say that the majority opinion, gauged by election results, is "extreme". However, if one takes "extreme" as a negative way of saying "principled", there might be some truth in it. I wonder how many modern right-wing academic or historical books - e.g. those recently removed from sale by Amazon, are on university reading lists.
How many books have been removed due to left wing students demands might be a good question, they certainly don't like the principle of academic freedom when it's anyone to the right of Stalin.