Introductory Note on a Proposed Council Decision Concerning the Placing on the Market, in Accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC, of GM Oiled Rape Product (Brassica Napus L., Gt73 Line) (link)

December 2, 2004

Brussels, 01 Dec 2004

Full text of Document 12857/1/04 Revision 01
Suite of documents 12857/1/04

No. Cion prop.: 12343/04
Subject: Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of an oiled rape product (Brassica napus L., GT73 line) genetically modified for tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate

1. On 11 February 2004, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) delivered its opinion that genetically modified oilseed rape product (Brassica napus L., GT73 line) is as safe as its conventional counterparts for humans and animals, and in the context of the proposed uses, for the environment. The EFSA also found that the monitoring plan provided by the consent holder was appropriate for the intended uses of the GT73 oilseed rape.

2. In June 2004, the Commission submitted to the Committee established under Article 30 of Directive 2001/18/EC , a draft decision authorising the placing on the Community market of this product for a duration of 10 years.

However, the Committee was unable to give an opinion.

3. Therefore on 9 September 2004, in accordance with the Comitology Procedure, the Commission decided to submit a proposal for a Council Decision.

As from 26 October 2004, the date on which all linguistic versions were available, the Council may act by qualified majority within a period set at three months in accordance with Article 30(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC .


[Public Info Net automatically generates links to Council Register documents where an appropriately formatted document number is given. However, the document may not be available for public use and/or it may not be loaded on the Council Register yet.]

Council Register

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns