Innovation investment unveiled

The Technology Strategy Board will commit more than £535 million to fund innovation in 2014-15

August 28, 2014

Energy is the area earmarked to receive the most, up to £82 million, closely followed by health and care with £80 million, according to the body’s Delivery Plan: Financial Year 2014-15 – Accelerating Economic Growth.

The document lists 12 “priority areas” designated for multimillion-pound investment to facilitate innovation projects, including those involving universities.

Other fields earmarked for major sums include high-value manufacturing (£72 million), transport (£70 million) and urban living (£63 million).

At the smaller end of the scale, £13 million is being committed both to the built environment and resource efficiency, according to the report published last month.

Enabling technologies – which include advanced materials, biosciences, electronics, sensors and photonics, and ICT – will get £20 million, accounting for 4 per cent of the board’s overall investment.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham