Increased burdens mean academic pay must rise, says Natfhe

March 17, 2000

Academic pay must increase by 30 per cent, according to claims presented to employers this week.

Lecturers' union Natfhe has called for an immediate 10 per cent pay rise for members in the new universities and a commitment from employers to close the 30 per cent pay gap between lecturers and comparable professions.

It wants employers to update the national contract to deal with increased burdens on staff caused by extra students and new demands from information technology and research.

Other demands include: an end to using part-time, temporary staff to cut costs; an increase in London Weighting allowances; paid parental leave and a common settlement date.

The Association of University Teachers is also meeting employers today to present formally its pay claim of 30 per cent over the next four years.

This year's pay round is likely to be the last before the national council, recommended by the Bett committee, is set up.

A draft report, drawn up by the Trades Union Congress, is now circulating describing the organisation of the new council.

But the two sides, which hope to meet before Easter, remain divided over Bett's suggestion that the council should determine terms and conditions as well as pay.

Of the 115 higher education institutions who responded to UCEA's consultation at the

beginning of this year, more than 80 per cent voted to be clear in

any negotiation with unions that the national council would not have power over terms and conditions.

UCEA has decided to negotiate with trade unions on this basis.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns