ILT funding dilemma

February 11, 2000

Most academics at a recent joint Natfhe/Association of University Teachers seminar on the Institute for Learning and Teaching were keen and positive about engaging in the nitty-gritty issues of equal opportunities, fee banding and how the ILT will require its members to engage with continuing professional development. Membership will enable academics to help shape the ILT's policy on these and other important issues (Soapbox, THES, February 4).

The threat of bureaucracy and who bears membership costs are important. But if it is to become a genuinely independent body the ILT cannot rely on government funding to subsidise membership fees. Rather, academics must push government to fund proper staffing to enable high-quality teaching to continue.

Alan John President, Natfhe

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments