‘I plead guilty to believing in choice’: Willetts responds to attack by Howard Hotson

David Willetts has rejected accusations that he wants to introduce a US-style model of higher education in a response to criticisms from a University of Oxford academic.

July 5, 2011

Addressing an analysis in the London Review of Books by Howard Hotson, an expert in early modern intellectual history, the universities and science minister said proposals in the White Paper would “strengthen the institutional arrangements which remain distinctive feature of our education system” and were “a long way from America”.

In a detailed letter to the LRB, Mr Willetts argues that organisations such as the Quality Assurance Agency and the Higher Education Statistics Agency will uphold academic standards and provide independent scrutiny, as opposed to lighter regulation in the US.

The universal student loan scheme will also be entirely different to the US system, where many students have to take on private loans to finance their studies, he adds.

“I’m not advocating some kind of Wild West free-for-all,” Mr Willetts writes.

“There must always be regulation and a clear legal framework, especially where there is a significant public subsidy.”

His letter follows an article by Professor Hotson published in the LRB in May, in which he said the dominance of Ivy League institutions in university world rankings created a “misapprehension” of the overall health of US higher education.

He claimed this delusion had afforded the UK government false justification for policies of “competition, marketisation and privatisation”.

Accusing Professor Hotson of painting a “crude caricature” of the government’s policy, Mr Willetts says: “I plead guilty to believing in choice and competition.

“But they must always be rooted in a national culture, strong institutions and a set of moral understandings.

“They should never jeopardise professional integrity and professional judgement.”

He adds that student numbers will “plateau” following the changes, due to come into effect in 2012.

“I believe that with money tight and the demographic decline in young people, we may well be on a plateau for a while,” Mr Willetts writes.

“But over time I hope, and I hope Hotson does too, that more people will have the chance of going to university, one of the things that makes ours an advanced, progressive society.”

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands