Huddersfield staff development may be like the Gulag, but it gets results

Deputy vice-chancellor Peter Slee describes the demanding approach that has led to rising standards

October 30, 2014

Rising standards at a university have been put down to the introduction of “a ‘Gulag’ form of staff development” by a senior manager.

Peter Slee, deputy vice-chancellor of the University of Huddersfield, said that the demanding approach of requiring all lecturers to have professional accreditation, a teaching qualification and to get a PhD if they do not already have one had been a key factor in improved student satisfaction.

Speaking at the Higher and Further Education Show at London’s Olympia earlier this month, Professor Slee said that academic staff were motivated by being asked three key questions: why would anyone want to be taught by them; why would anyone want to be led by them; and, if their job were advertised now, would they get it?

A PhD was a key part of the answer to these questions, he argued, with the proportion of Huddersfield lecturers who hold the qualification now at 60 per cent, up from 45 per cent. Another 30 per cent are registered on courses that they will complete over the next five or six years.

“It’s about a mindset and hopefully growing and developing in the job,” said Professor Slee. “It’s a ‘Gulag’ form of staff development, but what our students are finding is that it is benefiting them when they have staff with broader knowledge.”

Professor Slee conceded that not all employees had been happy with the management approach, or with the need to get a new academic qualification. Huddersfield’s staff headcount has reduced by 10 per cent in recent years, without redundancies or restructuring.

But he argued that the university’s current lecturers were “very productive staff doing great things for us”.

Huddersfield’s overall score in the National Student Survey rose from 76 per cent to 86 per cent between 2007 and 2013, while staff appear to be happy too, with Huddersfield claiming top spot in each of the four key areas of the last Times Higher Education Best University Workplace Survey.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan