Hiroshima study shows today's radiation guidelines are correct

August 5, 2003

Brussels, 04 Aug 2003

Some 58 years after the first atomic bombs were used in attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, a study has concluded that current safety limits on radiation exposure are correct.

The bombs were responsible for the deaths of 250,000 people, and also provided new information on how radiation causes cancer. Neutrons sent out by the bombs are believed to be responsible for one in five cancers.

A new test developed by a team of US researchers is able to ascertain how many neutrons the bombs emitted by testing metal lightning rods and gutters removed from buildings in Hiroshima after the blast. Previous research had to rely on estimates of how many neutrons were released, but these more accurate results suggest that the estimates were in fact correct.

'These findings provide, for the first time, clear measurement validation of the neutron doses to survivors in Hiroshima,' Dr Mark Little of the UK's Imperial College is reported as saying. 'The risks are pretty much what we thought they were.'

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns