Kingston had a similar experience to Durham University with the Heritage Lottery Fund ("Lottery rejects castle repairs", THES, August 11).
Last January, I applied for Pounds 78,000 to support the work of the Kingston local history project. The project met the criteria set by the HLF for a revenue grant, but by early April the application was rejected (without a visit) on the grounds that "support of education institutions for services, which are part of their core business are a low priority for funding" and because our project was already underway.
Is the latter a reasonable ground for rejection? Our application made it clear we were proceeding in stages, and, having successfully completed stage 1 and demonstrated that we could deliver stated outcomes, we were looking for funding for stages 2 and 3.
If there is "discrimination against universities", we should be told so.
Director, centre for local history studies, Kingston University
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now