Hepatitis B screening 'unfair to students'

October 26, 1995

Revised medical school guidelines on screening applicants for the hepatitis B virus continue to discriminate against students compared with health workers, according to medical student leaders.

The British Medical Association's medical students' committee said that although the new guidelines issued by the Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals have made some limited concessions for applicants who have not reacted positively to vaccination but are not infectious, the CVCP is wrong in ruling that infectious students should be excluded from clinical medical and dental courses.

Sandy Macara, chairman of the BMA council, has now written to the CVCP's medical committee asking for clarification.

"We really don't understand why medical students should be treated differently from other health workers," said Rupert Gauntlett, immediate past president of the medical students' committee.

"The Department of Health guidelines do not suggest that carriers should basically be barred from all hospitals. They need to be excluded from operating theatres for the safety of patients, but we don't believe they should be excluded altogether."

But Frank Harris, secretary of the council of deans of United Kingdom medical schools and faculties, strongly defended the guidelines. Medical students were not comparable to health workers, in that they followed a curriculum leading to a single form of registration, which did not restrict them to certain types of work.

"There is no provision for a lesser form of registration for students who cannot complete the prescribed course," he said. Registered doctors could be treated differently since they could choose which area to work in and were subject to their employers.

"There is an overriding duty of care and need to give primacy to the welfare of patients," he said. "If we are going to err in leaning one way or the other, as far as I'm concerned, we lean in the direction of patients' welfare."

A CVCP spokesman said it would be responding to the BMA in due course.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns