Hefce still cautious despite ‘record’ surpluses for universities

Measures of the financial health of universities are the “best on record” but the sector faces “a large degree of uncertainty” in future, according to England’s funding council.

March 12, 2012

The comments come as the body revealed that the sector’s operating surplus was £1 billion - or 4.6 per cent of total income – last year, up from a surplus of £708 million or 3.2 per cent in 2009-10.

However, according to the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s review - Financial health of the higher education sector: 2010-11 financial results and 2011-12 forecasts - the surplus is forecast to fall to £0 million in 2011-12 as a result of government funding cuts ahead of the introduction of higher fees.

The review, which is based on the annual accountability returns filed to Hefce by universities, concludes that despite uncertainty over government policy, there “is strong evidence that the sector is financially well prepared for the new funding system”.

On fears that the main risk from new fees and funding arrangements would be a drop in student numbers, the review says: “This risk now looks unlikely to materialise in the short-term as the recent [University and College Admissions Service] data indicate that student demand, for full-time undergraduate courses, is likely to exceed the number of places available in 2012-13.”

But the review also refers to the uncertainty – with the government yet to announce the future extent of price-based “margin” places and the AAB policy – over the proportion of student places that will be contestable between universities in 2013-14 and beyond.

“There continues to be a large degree of uncertainty about how the new system will operate in the medium term… in particular with regards to the policy of controlling student numbers,” the review says. “As the policy becomes clear we will need to re-assess the future financial prospects of the sector.”

Among other statistics, the review also shows that staff costs fell to 53 per cent of the sector’s income in 2010-11, down from 54.3 per cent the previous year.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns