HEFCE probe at Anglia

July 10, 1998

SENIOR managers at Anglia Polytechnic University face an investigation by the Higher Education Funding Council for England after complaints that they have attempted a cover-up of allegations exposed in a four-month investigation by The THES.

HEFCE is understood to be looking into complaints that the university failed to investigate properly allegations of nepotism, bullying and mismangement against its business school dean, Hugh Jenkins, and complaints that it victimised the whistleblower who raised the alarm. John Watts, head of management development, has been suspended for the past four months without a hearing.

This week HEFCE's chief spokesman said: "We are currently looking at whether the university has investigated certain allegations, brought to our attention, in a proper and effective manner. We will then pursue the matter as necessary with the vice-chancellor."

Allegations have centred on Professor Jenkins, whose son, Jonathan, has been a lecturer in his father's management development division. Complaints were raised that Mr Jenkins was found a temporary post to suit his experience, was later given a permanent post, and was given two promotions despite a poor academic record and a string of complaints about his teaching competence.

Vice-chancellor Mike Malone-Lee has refused to answer the following questions from The THES: * Why did the university issue a statement claiming that its audit and compliance committee found "no foundation" to any of the allegations made by Mr Watts when the committee report did raise "a number of issues of internal control"?

* Why was Mr Watts suspended?

* Why did Steve Marshall, pro vice-chancellor, tell staff that police had advised the university not to investigate hate mail against Mr Watts and five colleagues when the police have categorically denied this?

* The university has insisted that complaints have come from only one source - Mr Watts. Why then did the vice-chancellor write to all staff in the manangement development division, accusing them of a "conspiracy"?

It is understood that lecturers' union Natfhe, which represents both parties in the dispute, has called for an external inquiry.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Finance Analyst

Bpp University

HR Adviser

University Of The West Of Scotland

Catering Assistant

Edinburgh Napier University