Heads stonewall QAA proposals

December 17, 1999

Plans for assuring quality in higher education stalled this week as vice-chancellors and principals rejected them as "unacceptable" and the Quality Assurance Agency seemed poised to reject all alternatives.

In a submission to the QAA's three-week consultation, the Standing Conference of Principals said it was "totally opposed" to a number of QAA proposals. SCOP is forming a united front with the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals, the Scottish Standing Conference of Principals and Heads of Higher Education, Wales.

The QAA plans to band universities in three categories - excellent, approved and not approved - according to quality of teaching, allowing a single summative judgement to be made for each university department. It has also suggested an elite band of institutions could be given "beacon" status.

But SCOP says a single summative rating would "mislead" the public. It could encourage them to assume comparability where it did not exist, leading them to make "invalid" comparisons between institutions with different aims and objectives. SCOP is "totally opposed to any notion that an excellent category should be restricted to a small number of examples".

With support from the other representative bodies, SCOP has put forward an alternative framework under which summative judgements would be rejected in favour of "graded action points". Published reports on each institution's departments would offer a list of points for commendation and points for improvement, as currently used in institutional audits.

The points for improvement would be categorised on a three-point scale - as "essential", "advisable" or "desirable". This would provide a more balanced overview of key strengths and weaknesses.

The QAA said it was considering the responses to the consultation, but it seems likely it will resist the alternatives. Its blueprint has backing from the funding councils, and it is understood that ministers are keen to ensure that single summative judgements can be maintained. CVCP chief executive Diana Warwick said she was "hopeful" that a system acceptable to the sector could be agreed.

SCOP and the CVCP were due to meet the QAA in an attempt to end the deadlock this week.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns