Grant letter outlines cut in student number control limits

The government is to clamp down on over-recruitment of students by universities in order to keep costs under control, according to this year’s grant letter.

January 26, 2012

The letter from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to the Higher Education Funding Council for England, published on 25 January, says that maximum student places will be cut by 5,000 in 2012-13.

Previously, Hefce has set the maximum number of students that can be recruited slightly above what the government envisaged and planned funding for, the letter says.

However “the recent trend for strong recruitment across the sector now makes this approach unnecessary”, the letter says.

“As a result, we are now asking the council to reduce its entrant control maximum by 5,000 places in 2012-13. This brings it in line with our original spending plans and reduces the risk of over recruitment,” it continues.

The letter claims that this “does not represent a reduction in the total number of students the government expects to fund”.

However, the National Union of Students said that, coupled with the letter’s confirmation that the 10,000 extra “stimulus” places allocated in 2011-12 would not be repeated, this represented an “incredibly short-sighted” cut of 15,000 places.

The letter also makes clear that the fine for over-recruitment will increase in the coming years, from the £3,800 per student set for 2012-13.

The letter confirms funding levels for teaching and research indicated in last year’s letter.

Total teaching grant will fall from £4.645 billion in 2011-12 to £3.815 billion in 2012-13, an 18 per cent decline, with the letter giving an indicative total of £2.883 billion for 2013-14.

In its place, BIS will provide institutions with up-front student loans of £3.6 billion in 2012-13 rising to £5 billion in 2013-14.

As expected, the recurrent grant for research will rise very slightly to £1.587 billion in 2012-13.

The letter does not include any new announcement about the government’s policy to allow unlimited recruitment of students achieving AAB at A level.

It had been reported that the letter had been delayed as ministers contemplated changing the grade threshold to ABB.

However, the letter says: “We said we would monitor the impact of this new approach and its effect on supply and demand.

“We will write separately setting out our proposals for contestable places for 2013-14.”

The letter also demands that it is “essential that the sector exercise effective pay restraint, at a time when there is currently a pay freeze in place across other sectors in receipt of public funding”.

It asks institutions to make efficiency savings from quality related recurrent research costs of £45 million in 2012-13, £73 million in 2013-14 and £104 million in 2014-15.

These savings will be reinvested in research, it adds, suggesting that universities share research equipment and infrastructure.

Key Information Sets, which the government hopes will give students better data on which to base their university choice, should be prepared by September this year, the letter says.

Meanwhile, the premium universities receive for taking in students from poorer backgrounds remains the same, despite fears it could be cut.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride